| |



- Best Practices for Institutions
and Consumers: Internet Spam and Phishing

-
Current VIRUS Threat
FAQ:
Windows XP Service Pack 2
Information
Download
details: Windows XP Service Pack 2 for IT
Professionals ...
____________________
-
 


AMD Athlon XP 2100
80 GB Hard Drive
256MB DDR RAM
64MB ATI Radeon Video
Windows XP Home
Microsoft Office XP
DVD-ROM, CD-RW
$ 1100 USD
AMD Athlon XP 2500
80 GB Hard Drive
256MB DDR RAM
64MB ATI Radeon Video
Windows XP Home
Microsoft Office XP
DVD-ROM, CD-RW
$ 1300 USD
|

-
VISTA
or XP Pro?
Stay
with XP Pro for at least a year.
For several
years, especially since Windows XP Service Pack 2, Microsoft has
been tightening security in Windows and Internet Explorer. It's
hard to see at times, but I do think they have been making
progress. Nevertheless, with a completely new version of Windows
(Vista), Microsoft has the opportunity to do some radical things
that should help a lot more.
Many of
these "new" features have been available in other operating
systems or third-party products, but having them standard in
Windows makes a difference. I'd like to focus on some of the
important ones.
Corporate IT
has known for a long time (and if they don't, they're
incompetent) how to manage their Windows users with restricted
permissions, both on the network and on the local computer. For
the average home user it hasn't been hard to set up such
accounts, but it's common to run into applications that require
greater privileges that are provided on Windows XP for a Limited
User.
The problem
is changed in Windows Vista first by attitude. The word
"Limited" is gone and a "User Account" is now limited. Getting
an account with Administrator privileges is now the
extraordinary case, but it's not generally going to be
necessary. If you do something that requires admin privileges,
such changing firewall settings, the system will offer you an
opportunity to enter account credentials that have sufficient
privileges, such as the Administrator account. So you can run
normally as a non-Administrator. This is all called "User
Account Protection,".
Another User
Account Protection feature is that when programs write to
protected areas of the file system and registry, these writes
are actually stored in a separate area, maintained per user,
called the Virtual Store. This is very similar to what is done
on a Terminal Server, and in fact I wonder why the Virtual Store
is stored in C:\Virtual Store rather than under each user's
Documents and Settings folder as is done on Terminal Server.
Internet
Explorer 7 has many new security-related features on Windows
Vista and Windows XP, but the most important work only on XP. IE
runs, by default, in a crippled mode called Protected Mode.
Doing bold and possibly dangerous things will require special
permission. It's a special type of User Account Protection for
the browser.
Even if it
works perfectly, all you need to do is convince users that they
really do want to do the things that Windows is warning them
could be dangerous. IE7 has plenty of other cool and useful
security features, but they also all happen in Windows XP.
A good
example of a feature that has been around for a while is NAP
(Network Access Protection), which came out, I believe, for
Windows Server 2003. It is a set of programs and policies,
similar to Cisco's Network Access Control Program and the Zone
Labs Integrity product line, that defines security and other
requirements for a client before it attaches to a network. The
requirements can be that Windows be up to date with specific
patches, that anti-virus software be running and up to date,
that other programs be installed—just about anything.
The advance
in Vista may be as simple as bundling the client components of
NAP, but it would be good if this encourages use of it. there
yet.
Another
feature is that Windows Firewall will finally filter outbound
traffic. EFS disk encryption will improve. Windows programs can
be profiled so that the system will know what resources (such as
TCP ports) they use, and anything else will raise a red flag.
This isn't
the first time Microsoft has gotten serious about security, so
it would be premature to declare victory against security
threats, and Microsoft is plenty circumspect about the future of
such things. There is some clever stuff here though, along with
a continuation of a several-year trend of locking things down
after an orgy of opening insecure services in the late 1990s. If
all Windows users were running Vista, the Internet would be a
much safer place.
Overall,
Vista has made some big leaps forward but personally I wouldn't
jump on the bandwagon because of some issues that still lingers
with Vista's inter-operability with other perepherals such as
printers, I/O cards and drivers. I would recommend to continue
using XP Professional for a year before trying Vista.

|

 |
-
|
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Parallels - A
Rival in the Offing
- Boot Camp's rival has officially launched.
Parallels, a Herndon, Va.-based startup said June 15 that its
Desktop for Mac virtualization software has emerged from beta
and is available for $49.99.
The software, which allows Intel-based Apple computers to run
Windows XP, lets Apple users run Windows XP and Apple's OS X at
the same time.
Apple's Boot Camp software requires a restart in Windows or OS
X.
Parallels software takes relies on hypervisor-powered
virtualization engine, and supports Intel Virtualization
Technology, included in Intel-powered Macs.
Desktop for Mac's features let users:
* Run any version of Windows at the same time as Mac OS X at
near-native speeds, without dual booting or restarting.
* Use Linux, FreeBSD, Solaris, OS/2, eComStation, or MS-DOS
programs alongside Mac OS X applications.
* Cut and paste information between Windows and Mac OS X
programs.
* Expand a virtual machine to full-screen size on a primary
display, or export to a secondary display.
* Cut Windows 2000, 2003 and XP virtual machine hard drive size
by 50 percent or more with Parallels Compressor technology.
According to Parallels, its software was tested by 100,000 users
in 71 countries; among users who tested it was CompuHelpUSA
which rated the software at least good or excellent.
One thing to note here is that your Mac needs twice the memory,
preferably 2 Gigs will be an excellent start up point if you
- plan to
use two
operating systems.
|
|
 |
|